The Common Frame of Reference for European Private Law—Policy Choices and Codification Problems
*Dr Horst Eidenmüller, LLM, Professor of Private Law and German, European and International Company Law at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Dr Florian Faust, LLM, Professor of Private Law, Commercial Law, Business Law, and Comparative Law at the Bucerius Law School, Hamburg; Dr Nils Jansen, Professor and Director of the Institute for Legal History at the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster; Dr Hans Christoph Grigoleit, LLM, Professor of Private Law, Commercial and Company Law, and European Private Law at the University of Regensburg; Dr Gerhard Wagner, LLM, Professor of German and European Private and Procedural Law at the University of Bonn; Dr Reinhard Zimmermann, Professor and Director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg.
Correspondence: Email: r.zimmermann{at}mpipriv.de; okotokro{at}mpipriv.de.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
At the beginning of the year, the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) was published. The text is the result of the work of a broad range of private law scholars from the Member States of the European Union, and it presents itself as an ‘academic’ document, committed to the precepts of scholarship rather than politics. Notwithstanding its unwieldy name, the text is nothing less than the draft of the central components of a European Civil Code. The following article aims to inform the reader about this potentially important document and to initiate further academic debate about it. Following an overview of the genesis and content of the DCFR (Part 1), the discussion focuses on whether, and to what extent, it is based upon consistent and convincing core aims and values (Part 2). The article then proceeds to address, more specifically, the significance of private autonomy, and it examines the extent to which the proposed rules satisfy the requirements of legal certainty and legal clarity (Part 3). Thereafter, the DCFR is measured against the criteria of internal consistency and systematic integrity (Part 4). Also (Part 5) the question is asked whether the Draft critically reflects and convincingly integrates the sources on which it is based (that is the Lando Commission's Principles of European Contract Law and the Acquis Principles, as well as the private law traditions of the Member States). Also deserving of attention is the inclusion of more than 120 definitions of central concepts of private law, which are not to be found in this form or level of detail in either the Lando Principles or the national private laws (Part 6).
The original German version of this article has appeared in [2008] Juristenzeitung (JZ) 529–50.